|
![]() |
||
How can BIM benefit facilities management?
Interoperability, FM and BIM The study reported that owners and operators shoulder almost two-thirds of that cost as a result of ongoing facility operation and maintenance. These statistics are borne out in the day-to-day activities of facility managers, including manually updating occupancy reports, calculating area for space charge-backs by counting ceiling tiles, digging through stacks of building documentation to find the maintenance manual for water heater and searching in vain for an as-built floor plan, only to find they never received it in the first place. But the lack of interoperability highlighted in the NIST study is only part of the problem. Is the data trapped in those computer systems studied worth sharing? We tend to overlook the issue of data quality, glossing over the unfortunate truth that the data produced by conventional design software is often unreliable and thus not worth the effort required to share it. In contrast, the hallmark of BIM is coordinated, consistent, computable information about a building project -- information that's worth sharing and reusing. Facility managers use DWF technology to move the coordinated, consistent,
reliable space and room data being delivered from the Autodesk Revit
building information model into Autodesk FMDesktop. Therefore, owners and operators can mitigate their portion of the cost associated with the lack of interoperability cited above by using the high-quality building information from a BIM design process during the longer, more expensive maintenance and operation phase of the building's lifecycle. To that end, Autodesk has used DWF technology to link Autodesk Revit and Autodesk FMDesktop, Autodesk's suite of applications for organizing and reporting facility-related information. For more on DWF and BIM, see last month's column. DWF-Based Space Management Contrast this approach with the typical CAFM (computer-aided facilities management) process. The facility manager scans paper floor plans (or sometimes imports electronic CAD files) for use within the CAFM application. The electronic floor plans are then used as backdrops to create polylines (closed loops composed of line and arc segments) that define an area and identify room numbers to name that area. The time it takes to manually "polyline" a typical commercial building can stretch from days to weeks -- a typical 75,000 sq. ft., three-story office building might take four to five days to "polyline". This chore has spawned an entire cottage industry of "polylining" services. By using DWFs to move building data from Revit to FMDesktop, Autodesk has made this reliance on labor-intensive, manual creation of polylines obsolete. Traditionally, architects have had difficult choices to make when their clients asked for help getting design data into their CAFM systems. They could say "No," use high rates to dissuade the client, or agree to do tedious manual entry or complicated database transfers at low margin for the sake of a client relationship. But now, architects using Revit Building can simply publish their BIM to DWF and e-mail the file to their clients who use FMDesktop. The client imports the DWF file into FMDesktop, which reads the room boundaries, room areas, room numbers and descriptions from the DWF; compares them to the existing database; warns the client about new and removed rooms; and then updates the CAFM model. There's no need for polyline services or database transfers. In addition, DWF files can be generated from a variety of design systems using Autodesk's free DWF Writer. For non-Revit applications, there may be some manual data cleansing required by the facility manager, depending on the quality of the data coming from the design tool and the fidelity of its data transfer to DWF. But the end result is that owners and operators who use FMDesktop can consolidate data from multiple sources -- taking advantage of data coming from different architects and contractors who've worked on different properties, or renovated spaces using different authoring tools. Facility managers can then use the simple tools in FMDesktop to generate their own color-diagram room reports and their own floor plans with room numbers, areas, occupant names and the like without calling the architect -- unless it's time to move a wall. And, if that time comes, DWF also facilitates the return of updated information back to the architect's Revit BIM. For example, the facility manager can redline the DWF to highlight modified room numbers or room types, and e-mail the DWF back to the architect. Autodesk FMDesktop reads DWFs published by Autodesk Revit and automatically
interprets space and room data -- eliminating the need for manual creation
of polylines. Acceptance of BIM for FM Government agencies such as the U.S. GSA now require the delivery of
spatial program information from BIMs for major projects that are receiving
design funding in Fiscal Year 2007 and beyond. Last month's article was all about the advantages of digitally sharing the right building information with the right target audience. In the context of a building's total lifecycle, facility managers make up the bulk of that target audience, and they're now beginning to take advantage of the reliable building information being created by BIM solutions. By linking Autodesk Revit and Autodesk FMDesktop, facility managers can immediately realize several significant benefits. Using room data from the Revit design model eliminates costs associated with the manual creation of polylines. DWF technology minimizes the frustration of cobbling together disparate building data from multiple design sources. But most importantly, facility managers can rest easy -- confident in their use of the coordinated, consistent, reliable data being delivered from the BIM. Nov 6, 2006 |
![]() |
| Commercial Asbuilts: BOMA Asbuilt | Definitions | Projects | Project Types | FAQ | Useful links |
| Residential Asbuilts: Projects | Asbuilt Services | FAQ |
| Contact | Copyright | Privacy Policy | Site Map | News |